# Is there a CKKS example showing more math details instead of high-level scheme

**URL:** <https://openfhe.discourse.group/t/is-there-a-ckks-example-showing-more-math-details-instead-of-high-level-scheme/259>\
**Category:** Library Questions\
**Tags:** questions\
**Created:** [December 2, 2022, 8:43am UTC](https://openfhe.discourse.group/t/is-there-a-ckks-example-showing-more-math-details-instead-of-high-level-scheme/259 "2022-12-02T08:43:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@lance](https://openfhe.discourse.group/u/lance)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2022, 8:43am UTC](https://openfhe.discourse.group/t/is-there-a-ckks-example-showing-more-math-details-instead-of-high-level-scheme/259/1 "2022-12-02T08:43:34Z")

</div>

As title, I think it will be better to supply an a CKKS example with more math details.  
Now the high-level example in official site confuses me.  
I don’t no how the OpenFHE works, and also fail to develop my project.  
I hope there is an example with more low-level function of OpenFHE.

Danke!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iquah](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/openfhe.discourse.group/iquah/32/8_2.png) [@iquah](https://openfhe.discourse.group/u/iquah)\
**Post date:** [December 2, 2022, 3:16pm UTC](https://openfhe.discourse.group/t/is-there-a-ckks-example-showing-more-math-details-instead-of-high-level-scheme/259/2 "2022-12-02T15:16:47Z")

</div>

Hi there!

> I think it will be better to supply an a CKKS example with more math details

The following is only my opinion and not necessarily the other OpenFHE maintainers, but I think it’s important to realize that OpenFHE isn’t necessarily an educational tool. The goal isn’t to educate users about the theory but more act as a tool for those with knowledge about about FHE.

> fail to develop my project

What’s your project?

> I hope there is an example with more low-level function of OpenFHE.

Well, define “low-level”. This is rather under-specified.
