Possible working case for higher security value

Greating all,
I was trying to set the library to a higher security level, HEStd_192_classic, HEStd_256_classic for BFV-RNS scheme.
It returns the error that follows when it searches for the q and n, etc.
terminate called after throwing an instance of ‘std::bad_alloc’
what(): std::bad_alloc
Aborted (core dumped)
I suggest it might be due to the possible larger parameter size that causes the issue.
Is it possible to provide HEStd_192_classic, HEStd_256_classic working examples using the current version of the library for reference, also memroy/cpu requirements if they are important?

Can you share your code so we can try to reproduce the problem? Specifically, we need to check the multiplicative depth you set in your code. I tried the simple-integers program (with HEStd_192_classic) and it worked without issues on a commodity machine.

Thanks for your insight.
I changed the parameter accordingly, and it worked.
Thank you so much.

Glad it worked for you. Accepting the response above as a solution to your question would be helpful.